Legal Opinion
The Schumacher Group, Ltd. v. James Price Schumacher
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided November 17, 2015No. WD78341PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCynthia L. Martin, Judge
James Price Schumacher 1 (“James”) and Cindy Sue Davis (“Davis”) appeal the trial court’s entry of summary judgment on counterclaims they asserted. James and Davis argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because (1) the counterclaims were not barred by res judicata or collateral estoppel; (2) the counterclaims were not asserted against improper parties; and (3) summary judgment was granted after the counterclaims had been amended. Finding no error, we affirm. ...
Factual and Procedural Background 2
This cáse reflects another chapter in' the continuing ságá of protracted…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goerlitz v. City of MaryvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Jesser v. Mayfair Hotel, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- STRCUE, Inc. v. PottsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Goudeaux v. Board of Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Smith v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Holmes v. Kan. City Pub. Sch. Dist.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Wesley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jerry L. Wilson v. Wilda L. TrusleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- KDW Staffing, LLC v. Grove Construction, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Marilyn Carmack v. Travis Carmack and Temple I. BaxleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.