Legal Opinion
Gannon v. American Home Products
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 29, 2010No. DOCKET NO. A-3936-07T2PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
999 A.2d 522 (2010)
414 N.J. Super. 507
Jamie GANNON and Rebecca Gannon, individually and as husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS, INC.; American Cyanamid Company, Lederle Laboratories, and Wyeth-Lederle Vaccines, Defendants-Respondents.
DOCKET NO. A-3936-07T2.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 8, 2009.
Decided July 29, 2010.
Stanley P. Kops (Law Offices of Stanley P. Kops) of the Pennsylvania bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants (MacLachlan Law Offices and Mr. Kops, attorneys; Mr. Kops, on the brief).
Roger W. Yoerges…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. L'OreaL Usa, Inc. Redkin 5th Avenue, N.Y.CCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Watkins v. Resorts International Hotel & Casino Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gannon v. American Home Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Gannon v. American Home Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2012