Legal Opinion

Gannon v. American Home Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 15, 2012PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens

Plaintiffs Jamie and Rebecca Gannon, asserting that plaintiff Jamie Gannon developed a form of brain cancer because of a series of polio vaccines he was given as a child, pursued various forms of relief in both federal and state courts. In the federal court action, they sought relief from the United States pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-80, contending that the federal government was negligent in permitting the polio vaccine to be sold to the public. Plaintiffs’ federal action was dismissed following a partial bench trial, based on the government’s motion…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Nieder v. Royal Indemnity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. Yamaha Corporation of America v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Watkins v. Resorts International Hotel & Casino Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harold Hoffman v. Nordic Naturals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  2. Brownfield v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Garcia v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. In re the Liquidation of Integrity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  5. CHERI LANE VS. CITY OF CAMDEN (L-3958-15, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API