Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gannon v. American Home Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 15, 2012Published

1Dissent

Judge WEFING

(temporarily assigned), dissenting.

My colleagues have concluded that the Appellate Division erred when it reversed the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment to defendants and dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint. I am unable to agree, and therefore I dissent.

Plaintiff Jamie Gannon received five doses of an oral polio vaccine, administered by his pediatrician, between 1973 and 1976. He was later diagnosed with a medulloblastoma, a malignant brain tumor. Plaintiffs contend that the vaccine he received as a child was tainted with a simian virus known as SV40 and that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Watkins v. Resorts International Hotel & Casino Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  4. Olivieri v. Y.M.F. Carpet, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. Timothy O'Shea T/a Tim's Amoco v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API