Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Condemnation by Urban Redelopment Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 8, 1988No. Appeal 821 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
E-V Company and its lessee Keller Office Equipment Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Condemnees”) appeal an Allegheny County Common Pleas Court order overruling their preliminary objections to the declaration of taking filed by the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (Authority).
E-V, a partnership whose principals are also the shareholders of Keller, purchased the subject property in 1977, allegedly without notice that it was situated within an area certified as blighted since 1964.
The City of Pittsburgh Planning Commission…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Crawford v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Simco Stores v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Boehm v. Board of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Nixon Hotel, Inc. v. Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Condemnation by the Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Situate & Being in the ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Pennichuck Corp. v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- York City Redevelopment Authority v. Ohio Blenders, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Arrington v. Urban Redevelopment Authority of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.