Legal Opinion
Pennichuck Corp. v. City of Nashua
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 16, 2005No. 2004-717PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The plaintiffs, Pennichuck Corporation, Pennichuck Water Works, Inc., Pennichuck East Utility, Inc. and Pittsfield Aqueduct Company, Inc. (Pennichuck), appeal an order by the Superior Court {Lynn, C.J.) granting summary judgment to the defendant, City of Nashua (City), and ruling that the provisions of RSA chapter 38 (2000 & *731Supp. 2005) do not constitute a per se inverse condemnation in violation of the New Hampshire Constitution. The court also ruled that the City filed its petition with the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission (PUC) within a reasonable time and that it was not barred…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Burrows v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Hughes v. New Hampshire Division of AeronauticsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Sundell v. Town of New LondonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Appeal of Pennichuck Water Works, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Thomas v. Telegraph Pub. Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- State v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
- Clark v. N.H. Dep't of Emp't Sec.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- City of Blue Mound, Texas v. Southwest Water Company and Monarch Utilities I, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.