Legal Opinion
Arrington v. Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 24, 2003PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge COLINS.
Terrance Arrington and Rhonda L. Ar-rington (condemnees) appeal an Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas (common pleas court) order overruling their preliminary objections to a declaration of taking filed by the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (Authority). We affirm the order of the common pleas court.
The property owned by the Arringtons that was condemned by the Authority is located on the periphery of the Bedford Redevelopment Project. The Bedford Project is an ongoing development pro*137ject of the Bedford and Middle Hill areas in the City of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crawford v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- OLIVER v. ClairtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- In Re Condemnation by the Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- In the Matter of Condemnation by Urban Redelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- In re Condemnation by the Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re a Condemnation Proceeding by South Whitehall TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Redev't Authority of City of York v. BraticCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Arrington v. Urban Redevelopment Authority of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- City of Bethlehem v. A.S. Kanofsky, USA Appeal of: A.S. KanofskyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- In the Matter of Proceedings by the Redev. Auth. of the City of Erie ~ Appeal of: Zac Assocs., LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.