Legal Opinion

State v. Przeradzki

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1985No. 10245PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, C. J.

Defendant Shirley Przeradzki and her court-appointed private attorney Samuel P. King, Jr., appeal the lower court’s award to King of $3,000 attorney fees rather than the $10,340 he requested.

Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 802-5 (Supp. 1984) authorizes the trial court to pay court-appointed private attorneys no more than $3,000 per non-class A felony “case.” The sole issue raised by appellants is *21whether the word “case” as used in HRS § 802-5 means all matters within the numbered criminal case or each count involved in such case.1 Our answer is that it means…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Wakulla County v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Booker v. Midpac Lumber Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. UiHawaii Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. PowersHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re BettencourtHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Attorney's Fees of Bettencourt v. GondaHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. PowersHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Opinion No. (1990), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API