Legal Opinion

Attorney's Fees of Bettencourt v. Gonda

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2011No. SCAP-30616PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

McKENNA, J.

I. Introduction

Petitioner/Court-Appointed Counsel-Appellant David Bettencourt (“Bettencourt”) appeals from the order of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit’s administrative judge summarily reducing excess court-appointed attorney’s fees certified by the trial judge as necessary to provide fair compensation. We have accepted Bettencourt’s appeal as a discretionary transfer under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 602-58(b)(l) (1993 & Supp. 2010), as this ease presents a question of first impression regarding the scope of the administrative judge’s authority…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. PowersHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. United States v. Nicholas D'andrea, Jack Ware and Nelson HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. HarperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1970
  4. State v. PrzeradzkiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. United States v. SepulvedaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re BettencourtHawaii Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API