Attorney's Fees of Bettencourt v. Gonda
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
McKENNA, J.
I. Introduction
Petitioner/Court-Appointed Counsel-Appellant David Bettencourt (“Bettencourt”) appeals from the order of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit’s administrative judge summarily reducing excess court-appointed attorney’s fees certified by the trial judge as necessary to provide fair compensation. We have accepted Bettencourt’s appeal as a discretionary transfer under Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 602-58(b)(l) (1993 & Supp. 2010), as this ease presents a question of first impression regarding the scope of the administrative judge’s authority…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Attorney's Fees of Mohr v. PowersHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- United States v. Nicholas D'andrea, Jack Ware and Nelson HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- United States v. HarperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1970
- State v. PrzeradzkiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985
- United States v. SepulvedaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2007
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re BettencourtHawaii Supreme Court · 2011