State v. Bachman
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Justice.
David Bachman appeals his conviction for two counts of sexual contact with a child under sixteen years of age and two counts of rape. We affirm, holding that (1) there was sufficient evidence to support the jury verdicts on all four counts; (2) the trial court did not err in admitting into evidence expert testimony concerning rape trauma syndrome; and (3) the charges of rape and sexual contact are mutually exclusive.
FACTS
Bachman met M.E. (mother of the victims) in 1985. Shortly thereafter, they began living together in Sturgis, South Dakota. Bachman later met A.E., J.E. and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. FloodySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.