Legal Opinion
Hydro Systems, Inc. v. Continental Insurance Company, a New Jersey Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 25, 1991No. 89-55953PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:
Hydro Systems, Inc. appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment against it in its action for breach of an insurance contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. This court has diversity jurisdiction over the appellant’s timely appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
BACKGROUND
Appellant Hydro Systems, Inc. (“Hydro”) manufactures fiberglass bathtubs at a plant located in Simi Valley, California. The manufacturing process involves three raw materials: fiberglass, gel coat and resin. Gel Coat and resin are…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Fu-Kong Tzung Jean Tzung v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, and Does 1 Through 100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Continental Casualty Company v. City of Richmond, a Municipal Corporation, and Mead Reinsurance Company, Defendant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- MacKinnon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Sullins v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. Safe Tire Disposal Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.