United States v. Paul Dicaro
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Paul DiCaro appeals his conviction following a jury trial on one count of engaging in racketeering activity in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) (1982), 1 and one count of interfering with interstate commerce by committing an armed robbery in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (1982). 2 For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the conviction on the RICO count, but affirm the conviction. on the Hobbs Act count.
I
The events leading up to DiCaro’s convictions, insofar as they are relevant…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. ReddIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. George I. BennyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Richmond v. Nationwide Cassel L.P.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.