Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Dicaro

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 4, 1985No. 83-2797PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Paul DiCaro appeals his conviction following a jury trial on one count of engaging in racketeering activity in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) (1982), 1 and one count of interfering with interstate commerce by committing an armed robbery in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (1982). 2 For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the conviction on the RICO count, but affirm the conviction. on the Hobbs Act count.

I

The events leading up to DiCaro’s convictions, insofar as they are relevant…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. ReddIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. United States v. George I. BennyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. Richmond v. Nationwide Cassel L.P.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API