Legal Opinion
Richmond v. Nationwide Cassel L.P.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 11, 1995No. 94-1540PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Adrienne Richmond brought an amended complaint against defendants Nationwide Cassel L.P. (“Cassel”), Nationwide Acceptance Corporation (“Nationwide Acceptance”), and N.A.C. Management Corporation (“NAC”). She alleged that they forced her to pay for excessive automobile insurance and therefore violated 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). She now appeals the district court’s dismissal of her claim. For the reasons presented in this opinion, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Ms. Richmond…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd. v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- First Capital Asset Management, Inc. v. Satinwood, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Limestone Development v. Village of Lemont, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.