Legal Opinion
Gorman v. Butzel
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket No. 29, Calendar No. 38,398PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
This is a bill for foreclosure of a land contract. The sole question is whether the court erred in refusing deficiency decree against defendant Butzel.
November 6, 1924, plaintiffs sold premises to Leo M. Butzel on land contract, the last installment being payable May 6, 1933.
May 26, 1925, Mr. Butzel assigned the contract to, Milton Freud by written assignment, in which the assignee assumed and agreed to pay the balance owing. The assignment was executed by Butzel, Freud and plaintiff Gorman. The testimony contained no explanation of Gorman’s signature to the assignment except that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnard v. HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Chicago Boulevard Land Co. v. NuttenMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Clark v. BussardMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Bigelow v. MacCroneMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Imperial Hotels Corporation v. Arthur P. Dore Jay Ambe Corporation and Dore Development Company, Mainstream Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Perry Drug Stores v. CSK Auto Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- General Electric Co. v. LevineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- BRB Printing, Inc. v. BuchananDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
- BRB Printing, Inc. v. BuchananDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.