Legal Opinion

Chicago Boulevard Land Co. v. Nutten

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1934No. Docket No. 20, Calendar No. 37,715PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

In determining whether in a given case there has been novation of parties, all the facts and circumstances of that case are to be considered. Fender v. Feighner, 265 Mich. 536. There may not be a single act or transaction which in and of itself would disclose or establish novation; but from all the acts of the parties concerned it may appear that in fact and in law there has been a novation. In each case determination of this question should be based upon «the particular facts therein disclosed. As bearing upon novation in the instant case the following facts are important and I think…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sloman v. CutlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Keppen v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Fender v. FeighnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Smitter v. GeurkinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler Corporation, Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler Corporation, Appeal of Computer Systems of America, Inc., Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  2. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  3. George Realty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Gorman v. ButzelMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Ramos v. HolmbergMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API