Legal Opinion

Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1926No. Docket No. 52PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On May 4, 1894, a contract was entered into between the Citizens’ Development Company, of Ludington, a corporation, the Flint & Pere Marquette Railroad Company and the Epworth League Training Assembly, a corporation, whose name was afterwards changed to the Epworth Assembly, the plaintiff herein. After recitals stating the purposes thereof, the development company agreed therein to convey certain real estate, lying along the shore of Lake Michigan and about two miles north of Luding-ton, to the Assembly. It also agreed to pay to the Assembly the sum of $1,000 and to attempt to secure…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Jones v. Van BochoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Barrie v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Department of Natural Resources v. Carmody-Lahti Real Estate, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Coates & Hopkins Realty Co. v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Bruce v. Henry Ford HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. W. A. Foote Memorial Hospital, Inc v. City of Jackson Hospital AuthorityMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API