Legal Opinion
State v. Larivee
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 30, 2003No. C2-01-1942PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, Justice.
Appellant Michael Larivee was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol — child endangerment in violation of Minn. Stat § 169.121, subd. 1(a) and subd. 3(c)(4) (1998), refusal to submit to testing in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. la and subd. 3(c)(4) (1998), and failure to properly stop at a stop sign in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.30 (1998). The district court ruled that by being denied access to an independent blood-alcohol test, the appellant’s due process right to a fair trial was violated on the driving under the influence charge but not on…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Killian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. NetlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. TenninSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.