Legal Opinion

Krausz v. Travelers Insurance Co. of Hartford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1938Published

1DissentO’Malley, J.

The first cause of action seeks to recover disability benefits under a policy of life insurance for a period antedating notice of such disability, and the second to recover premiums paid during such period of disability. The verdict of the jury is conclusive on the issue of the existence of total and permanent disability.

An examination of the terms of the policy leads to the conclusion that proof of total and permanent disability prior to the age of sixty, even though furnished after the insured had reached and passed such age, was sufficient; that due proof of disability, though furnished…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Luftig v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Schollman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Krausman v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API