Legal Opinion

Krausman v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

Plaintiff brings this action upon two policies of life insurance issued upon the life of the plaintiff herein for $3,000 and $6,000, respectively. Specifically, the present cause of action is based on supplemental contracts attached to the said policies providing for disability benefits, in the event of total and permanent disability, by way of monthly income and waiver of premiums by the defendant issuing the policies. The present action was preceded by one brought by the defendant against the plaintiff to obtain a rescission of the insurance contract because of fraud and misrepresentation…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Bank of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. TenneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. Pollack v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
  3. Krausz v. Travelers Insurance Co. of HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API