Legal Opinion
Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 2000No. S062201PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
100 Cal.Rptr.2d 352 (2000)
24 Cal.4th 317
8 P.3d 1089
John GUZ, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
BECHTEL NATIONAL, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. S062201.
Supreme Court of California.
October 5, 2000.
Bianco & Murphy, Stephen M. Murphy, San Francisco; Quackenbush & Quackenbush and William C. Quackenbush, San Mateo, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Thomas W. Osborne and Melvin Radowitz, Washington, Dist. of Col., for the American Association of Retired Persons as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Paul Grossman, Paul W. Cane, Jr., John C. Oakes,…
2Cases cited137 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wallace v. County of StanislausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Lindell v. Synthes USADistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Hughes v. PairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Evanston Ins. Co. v. HarrisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Meisner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.