Legal Opinion

Lindell v. Synthes USA

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 6, 2016No. 1:11-cv-02053 LJO BAMPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: PARTIES’ CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docs. 207 & 212)

Lawrence J. O’Neill, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Troy M. Lindell was employed as a sales consultant for Defendants Synthes USA, Synthes USA Sales, and Synthes Spine Company (collectively “Synthes Companies”) and was responsible for certain territories in California. He argues, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated class members, that Defendants’ employment practices violate several California Labor Codes.

II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff filed this class action…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Soremekun v. Thrifty Payless, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Fraser v. GoodaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Burch v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Cole v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. Evans v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  4. Foon v. Centene Management Company, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Tolefree v. Swift Transportation Co. Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API