Legal Opinion
Meisner v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 30, 2020No. 2:20-cv-01766Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] | Jeffrey Meisner, Esq., No. 2:20-cv-01766-KJM-CKD 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Jeffrey Meisner, an attorney, alleges Chase wrongfully led him to believe that a 18 | $135,000 check he deposited in a client trust account was “valid” when in fact it was a fraud. He 19 | was forced to use his own retirement savings to fund the trust account after Chase discovered the 20 | fraud and debited the $135,000. He asserts claims under California law for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Domino Sugar Corporation v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, an Unincorporated AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Sonoma County Ass'n of Retired Employees v. Sonoma CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.