Legal Opinion

Newhall v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 6, 1913No. 911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7351 (T. D. 32420)!

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

This case involves the dutiability of sulphur imported from Japan in 1908, 1909, and 1910. It was assessed for duty by the collector, and the Government here claims the same to be dutiable under paragraph 84 of the tariff act of 1897 and paragraph 81 of the tariff act of 1909, the material parts of which are identical and read as follows: Sulphur, refined or sublimed, or flowers of, * * *.

A duty of $8 per ton was imposed by the earlier and $4 per ton by the later act.

The importers, and there are "several in this case, claim the merchandise to be entitled to free entry under paragraph 674 of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. United States v. Danker & MarstonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  3. United States v. Continental Color & Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Goat & Sheepskin Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. Audiovox Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  3. United States v. GavinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. United States v. Wolff & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  5. Wright v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API