Wright v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Cross appeals from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 38142.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
These importations were of tea. The issues concern the coverings of the merchandise. Two appeals are here upon the same record, arising out of as many classes of coverings or containers employed. *529One of these classes consisted of lead packets and tin boxes of tea, each weighing less than five pounds, packed in other intermediate metal or pasteboard coverings or containers, whereby the latter held a great number of the individual packages. The other class consisted of similar lead packets and tin boxes and packets and boxes made of pasteboard and metal, each containing less than 5 pounds of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Goat & Sheepskin Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. Michelin Tire Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. Hatters' Fur ExchangeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Aetna Explosives Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. Brown & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Smith & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
- United States v. LeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.