Legal Opinion

Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co. v. Wailuku Sugar Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1904PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Ciecuit Judge, Fiest Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

The bill is for an injunction to restrain alleged illegal diversions of water from the Wailnkn Stream, Maui. Upon a plea in bar, interposed by the respondent, this court on appeal has decided to what extent the judgment- in Lonoaea et al. v. Wailuku S. Co. et alt., 9 Haw. 651, which judgment is binding upon the present parties, has determined the several matters now in controversy, 14 Haw. 50.

After the ruling upon the plea, the circuit judge, with the consent of the parties, appointed a commissioner and directed him to take evidence and to make findings upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peck v. BaileyHawaii Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co. v. Wailuku Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Lonoaea v. Wailuku Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Robinson v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. RobinsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Territory of Hawaii Ex Rel. Bailey v. GayHawaii Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Robinson v. AriyoshiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API