Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii Ex Rel. Bailey v. Gay

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1930No. 1921PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP

PERRY, C. .T.

This is a suit in equity instituted by the Territory of Hawaii for the purpose of restraining a diversion by the respondents of certain waters from the valley of Koula by means of dams, ditches and pipelines to the arid lands of Makaweli, on the Island of Kauai. The Territory as owner or as representative of the United States of America is in control of the ahupuaa of Hanapepe whose boundaries were settled and determined by a commissioner of boundaries for that island. Within the outer boundaries of this ahupuaa are two valleys, called respectively Koula and Manuahi,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Atchison v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Peck v. BaileyHawaii Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Harris v. CarterHawaii Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Hawaiian Commercial & Sugar Co. v. Wailuku Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Robinson v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Selwyn A. Robinson v. George R. Ariyoshi, Governor, and McBryde Sugar Company, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. McBRYDE SUGAR COMPANY, LIMITED v. RobinsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Robinson v. AriyoshiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API