Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Ariyoshi
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided October 26, 1977No. Civ. 74-32PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
PENCE, District Judge.
Succinctly stated, the nominal plaintiffs, the Robinson family (hereinafter G & R), ask this court:(1) To enjoin defendants Ariyoshi, Amemiya, et al. (State Officials), who are respectively the Governor, Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, and Chairman and Members of the Board of Land and Natural Resources of the State of Hawaii (State), from interfering with the transportation and use of waters of the Hanapepe River (River) for irrigation purposes in the same manner and with the same property rights therein as existed prior to the holdings of the Supreme…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Robinson v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
- Selwyn A. Robinson v. George R. Ariyoshi, Governor, and McBryde Sugar Company, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Marianne O'Brien Reynolds v. State of Georgia George Busbee, Individually and as Governor of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.