Legal Opinion

Kelleys Island Caddy Shack, Inc. v. Zaino

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2002No. 2001-1102PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

{¶ 1} In Am.Sub.H.B. No. 327, 145 Ohio Laws, Part III, 5409, 5410-5411, the General Assembly enacted R.C. 5739.101, which permits a municipal corporation or township to declare itself to be a “resort area” if it meets certain statutory criteria. As a resort area, the legislative authority of the municipal corporation or township may levy an excise tax on vendors for the privilege of making sales in, or transporting persons or property to or from, the municipality or township. R.C. 5739.101(B). Finding that it met the statutory criteria, the village of Kelleys Island declared itself to be a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Desenco, Inc. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cleveland Gear Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Zupancic v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. Stanton v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Put-In-Bay Island Taxing District Authority v. Colonial, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Congress of Parents & Teachers v. State Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of East Liverpool v. Columbiana County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Dayton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Cuyahoga County Veterans Services Commission v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Kelleys Island Caddy Shack v. ZainoOhio Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API