Legal Opinion

Kelleys Island Caddy Shack v. Zaino

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 2002No. 2001-1102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 375.] KELLEYS ISLAND CADDY SHACK, INC., APPELLANT, v. ZAINO, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE. [Cite as Kelleys Island Caddy Shack, Inc. v. Zaino,

2002-Ohio-4930.] Taxation—Sales tax—Resort-area tax—R.C. 5739.101 does not violate the Uniformity Clause, Section 26, Article II of the Ohio Constitution—Tax on transporting persons or property to or from village of Kellys Island is constitutional. (No. 2001-1102—Submitted June 5, 2002—Decided October 2, 2002.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2000-B-819. __________________…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Desenco, Inc. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cleveland Gear Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Zupancic v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. Stanton v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Put-In-Bay Island Taxing District Authority v. Colonial, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of East Liverpool v. Columbiana County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Dayton v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Cuyahoga County Veterans Services Commission v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Colonial, Inc. v. McClainOhio Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API