Casey v. Thieviege
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; John Lindsay, Judge. ActioN by George H. Casey and others against T. Thieviege and others. J udgment for plaintiffs. From the judgment and from an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly
Ejectment. Appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
We shall not undertake to investigate the merits of these appeals, for the reason that the brief filed by appellants in support of them does not comply with the rules of this court in two important particulars.
1. It contains no statement of the case in conformity with the requirement of Subdivision “a” of Subsection 3 cf Rule X in that it does not contain “a concise abstract or stater ment of the case;, presenting succinctly the questions involved, and the manner in which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haupt v. SimingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Rehberg v. GreiserMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Kranich v. Helena Consolidated Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1902
- Charles Schatzlein Paint Co. v. GodinMontana Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by6 opinions
- Elliott v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Larkin v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
- Hickey & Co. v. KaufmanMontana Supreme Court · 1906
- McIntosh Hardware Co. v. Flathead CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1905
- Allen v. ReelyMontana Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.