Legal Opinion

Rehberg v. Greiser

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1900No. 1255PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Lewis and Cla/rhe County; Henry C. Smith, Judge. Action by Edward Rehberg against Gus Greiser. Eroin a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pigott

The plaintiff brought this action to recover a judgment against the defendant for damages, and for an injunction perpetually restraining him from preventing the one-half of the water flowing through a certain ditch from passing into the ditch of plaintiff. A trial was had by the court sitting with a jury. From the judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial, the defendant has appealed.

After hearing the oral arguments of counsel, we were clearly of the opinion that the judgment and order refusing a new trial were correct, and that they should be affirmed upon the merits; but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Charles Schatzlein Paint Co. v. GodinMontana Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Whitney v. DeweyIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Rogness v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. HoldrenMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  4. T. C. Power & Bro. v. StockingMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Matusevitz v. HughesMontana Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API