Legal Opinion

Kranich v. Helena Consolidated Water Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1902No. 1,439PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Lewis and Clarke County; II. C. Smith, Judge. ActioN by AVilliam Kranicli against the Helena Consolidated AVater Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Motion to strike the bill of exceptions from the record.

1Opinion of the Court 1

MotioN to Struck Out Bill oe Exceptions.

MK.‘ JUSTICE PIGOTT

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff has appealed from a final judgment. The defendant moves that the bill of exceptions included in the transcript be stricken therefrom for the reason that it was neither served nor filed in time, and is therefore not properly a part of the transcript or record on appeal. The objections of the defendant to the settlement, together with the matter in support of the objections, appear upon the face of the bill.

The record on appeal from a final judgment consists of a copy of the notice of…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Pigott.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Carr, Ryder & Adams Co. v. ClosserMontana Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merk v. Bowery Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Robinson v. Helena Light & Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. T. C. Power & Bro. v. StockingMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Casey v. ThieviegeMontana Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API