Hickey & Co. v. Kaufman
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; J. B. MeClernan, Judge. Action by T. F. Hickey & Co. against Jake Kaufman and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway
The defendants appealed to this court from a judgment, and from an order of the district court denying them a new trial.
Appellants’ brief does not contain any specification of errors relied upon, as required by Rule X of the Rules of this court (30 Mont, xxxviii, 82 Pac. ix). Upon the authority of the following eases the judgment and order are affirmed: (Cole v. Ryan, 24 Mont. 122, 60 Pac. 991; Rehberg v. Greiser, 24 Mont. 487, 62 Pac. 820; Casey v. Thieviege, 27 Mont. 516, 71 Pac. 755; Larkin v. Butte & Boston C. M. Co., 28 Mont. 41, 72 Pac. 304.
Affirmed.
Mr. Chief Justice Brantly concurs.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rehberg v. GreiserMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Casey v. ThieviegeMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Cole v. RyanMontana Supreme Court · 1900
- Larkin v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murphy v. NettMontana Supreme Court · 1911