Legal Opinion
United States v. Cepeda Penes
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 16, 1978No. Nos. 77-1114, 77-1177PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellee, McCulloch Gas Processing Corporation, brought this action against Hidrogas1 and, more significantly for purposes of this appeal, William C. Arntz, Regional Administrator of the Federal Energy Administration, Region IX, and the United States. McCulloch claims that it suffered a legal wrong as a result of certain FEA 2 orders requiring it to continue supplying Hidrogas with propane despite *714that purchaser’s poor credit posture and history of financial delinquency. McCulloch seeks to recover $897,184.65, plus interest, for propane delivered to Hidrogas in 1974 and 1975. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Americo Mosca v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Herman Duarte v. United States of America and United States Coast GuardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- In Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Anthony Provenzano, Stephen Andretta, and Thomas AndrettaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- State v. CroweTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.