King v. Motley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBOrne, J.
“Tbe office of demurrer is to test tbe sufficiency of a pleading, admitting, for tbe purpose, tbe truth of tbe allegations of fact contained therein; and ordinarily relevant inferences of fact, necessarily deducible therefrom, are also admitted . . .,” Stacy, C. J., in Ballinger v. Thomas, 195 N.C. 517, 142 S.E. 761. See also McCampbell v. Building & Loan Asso., 231 N.C. 647, 58 S.E. 2d 617, and cases there cited.
Tbe statute G-.S. 1-151 requires that “in tbe construction of a pleading for tbe purpose of determining its effect its, allegations shall be liberally construed with a view to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Roberts v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Dickerson v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- McCampbell v. Valdese Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Guerry v. American Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Clinard v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Bryant v. Little River Ice Co. of Zebulon, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.