Legal Opinion

Metzler v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 11, 2012No. 2 CA-CV 2011-0133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant Marisol Metzler appeals from the trial court’s ruling granting appellee BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Inc.’s (BCI) motion for judgment on mandate. She contends the court erred by granting prejudgment interest from the date of the offer of judgment only to the date of the initial judgment, which had been vacated by the grant of BCI’s motion for a new trial, instead of to the date of the judgment on mandate following this court’s reversal of the trial court's grant of a new trial. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the judgment and remand.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vega v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. Berry v. 352 E. Virginia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Drozda v. McComasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Nielson v. PattersonArizona Supreme Court · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Company of Los Angeles, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Charles W. Stenz v. City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Marisol Metzler v. Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Charles W. Stenz v. City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Gipson v. ShinninkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API