Legal Opinion

Charles W. Stenz v. City of Tucson and Pinnacle Risk Management Services

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 8, 2014No. 2 CA-IC 2013-0022PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VÁSQUEZ, Judge.

¶ 1 In this statutory special action, petitioner Elizabeth Stenz, widow of Charles Stenz, the petitioner employee, challenges the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) award denying her interest on the death benefits she received four years after Charles’s death. She argues Arizona law requires payment of the interest. We agree and set aside the award.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶ 2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to upholding the award. Polanco v. Indus. Comm’n, 214 Ariz. 489, ¶ 2, 154 P.3d 391, 392-93 (App.2007). But, here, the facts are not in dispute.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Schade v. DiethrichArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. Polanco v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ernie Luna Jr. v. Pima County and Tristar Risk ManagementCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Stenz v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Stenz v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API