Legal Opinion

Smith v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 16, 1939No. 4 Div. 75PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a suit by appellee against appellant on the common counts, naming them all except for money had and received, but including that of an “account.”

The basis ‘of plaintiff’s claim is that he made a contract with defendant to drill a well on plaintiff’s land, to furnish the labor and material including a cast iron pipe casing extending to marl or rock, and a galvanized pipe inside the casing extending to the bottom of’the well.

After the well was completed, defendant claimed to have drilled it three hundred one and four-tenths feet, and made claim for that amount at the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Denson v. Kirkpatrick Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. CarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Jackson v. SampleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Southern Building & Loan Ass'n v. WalesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Southern Building Loan Association v. WalesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rice v. Tuscaloosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS WKRS. COMPEN. SELF INS. FUND v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  3. Tuscaloosa Motor Company v. CockrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API