Legal Opinion
Rice v. Tuscaloosa County
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 30, 1941No. 6 Div. 800PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRIS, Special Justice.
The appellant was judge of the Probate Court of Tuscaloosa County from December 15, 1934, to November 15, 1936, during which time the method of his compensation' was what is commonly known as the feé' system.
By Sections 370-A and 370-B of the Gen- . eral Revenue Act of 1935, General Acts-1935, pp. 256, 564, 565, approved July 10, • 1935, the legislature attempted to limit the ' compensation of all probate judges in the-state, except the few who were by virtue of.. local acts compensated by salary,' to six thousand dollars per annum; these sections-• by their terms…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Mobile County v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Town Council of Cahaba v. BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Johnson v. BlackSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- Hemphill v. MoodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marshall County v. UptainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Stone v. Mellon Mortgage CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Williams v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Jones v. AllenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007
- Jeter v. Montgomery CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.