Legal Opinion
Ciolino v. Dzurenda
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided November 17, 2021No. 2:19-cv-00520Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 STEPHEN CIOLINO, Case No. 2:19-cv-0520-MMD-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND 6 v. DENYING, IN PART, CIOLINO’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY 7 JAMES DZURENDA, et al., AND GRANTING MOTION TO 8 Defendants. EXTEND TIME 9 [ECF Nos. 50, 51] 10 11 Before the Court is Stephen Ciolino’s (“Ciolino”) motion to compel and a request 12 for an extension of time to conduct discovery. (ECF Nos. 50, 51.)1 Defendants opposed 13 the motion, (ECF No. 52), and no reply was filed. Having considered the above 14 documents, the motion to compel…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Thompson v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Estate of Henry Barabin v. Astenjohnson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.