Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Shrigley
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided February 21, 1939No. 601PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAGON, District Judge.
On November 25, 1931, the plaintiff issued to Guy Shrigley its policy of insurance which carried the following provision as Agreement “A” Section I: “To1 Pay all sums which the assured shall become liable to pay as damages imposed upon him by law for bodily injury, including death at any time resulting therefrom (herein callled “Bodily Injury”), accidentally sustained by any person or persons if caused by the ownership, maintenance or use of any automobile disclosed in the declarations for the purpose therein stated;” The policy also provided that if claims are made for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Cormier v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Williams v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Roche v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Fox v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. CowanTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Rolette County v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1978
- Aim Insurance Co. v. CulcasiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HoagMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.