Roche v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtAdel, J.
These actions are brought under the provisions of section 109 of the Insurance Law. The plaintiffs had previously recovered judgments against one Hoffman for damages sustained due to his negligence. The judgment in the case of plaintiff Thomas J. Roche, an infant, was for personal injuries suffered by him, while the judgment in the case of the father, the other plaintiff, was for expenses and loss of services. The cases were tried together by the court without a jury and the judgments appealed from were entered upon a verdict in favor of the defendant in each case.
The defendant was the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Bakker v. Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Floyd v. Consolidated Indemnity & InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Steir v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Tulchinsky v. Public Service Mutual Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Schmidt v. Utilities Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Bobier v. National Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- McConnell v. Fireman's Fund American InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Huntington Cab Co. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.