Legal Opinion
Cestaro v. MacKell
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 1, 1977No. 76 C 682PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEORGE C. PRATT, District Judge:
MEMORANDUM
Invoking the fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, and fourteenth amendments and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1 plaintiffs seek monetary, declaratory, and injunctive relief to remedy injuries allegedly incurred because of defendants’ conspiratorial violations of their civil rights. Defendants have moved for dismissal. For the reasons set forth below, I find that the action is time-barred and that defendants’ motions must therefore be granted. The following discussion necessarily assumes the complaint’s allegations to be true.
THE COMPLAINT
The complaint names as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Adolph G. Hoffman v. C. H. Halden, Dr. Donald E. Wair, Dr. G. F. Keller and Dr. F. Sydney HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Moviecolor Limited v. Eastman Kodak Company, Technicolor, Inc. And Technicolor Motion Picture CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Agnes E. NILSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the CITY OF MOSS POINT, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Montell N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- D'ANGELO v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Smith v. United Transportation Union Local No. 81District Court, S.D. California · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.