Legal Opinion

Strother v. Folk

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 29, 1922No. 11084PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court en banc was delivered by

Mr. Chirr Justice Gary.

The provision of the will, out of which this action arose, is as follows:

“It is also my will and desire that all the property both real and which I have willed and bequeathed to said Julia Ann Long or which may accrue to her under said will and testament shall be and remain to her during her natural life and to descend to the heirs of her body, and if she the said Julia Ann Long should die without issue or children of her body the said property to return to my son, Moses Long.”

The following appears in the agreed statement…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adams v. VernerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  2. McFadden v. McFaddenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  3. Avinger v. AvingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
  4. Williams v. GauseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  5. Dillard v. YarboroSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lucas v. ShumpertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Davis v. StraussSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  3. Woodle v. Hl Tilghman, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. First National Bank v. HutsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  5. Jarecky v. JareckySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API