Legal Opinion
Woodle v. Hl Tilghman, Jr.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 10, 1959No. 17500PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, Justice.
The question presented is whether Della Moneyham acquired a fee conditional estate under the following Item in the will of Araline Moneyham:
“Item 5th. I give and devise to Della Moneyham (now about 15 years of age) for life only and then unto the lawful issue of her body, and if she should die without children then to Robert Harper’s children, share and share alike all that tract of the James Godbolt land North of a line run by J. B. White, Surveyor, during the year 1887 from Great Pee Dee River in the direction of Bear Swamp.”
In other items of the will the testatrix devised a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Adams v. VernerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
- Strother v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Bethea v. BetheaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
- First Carolinas Joint S.L. Bk. of Cola. v. FordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Dillard v. YarboroSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bowles v. BradleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Smoak v. McClureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Scarborough Ex Rel. Will of Scarborough v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Bethea v. BassSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Woodle v. TilghmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.