Legal Opinion

Davis v. Strauss

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 14, 1934No. 13872PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice, Stabler.

This is an action for the recovery of certain real estate and for damages for its use and occupancy by the defendants. The following undisputed facts appear in the record for appeal: On September 30, 1902, Rebecca C. Davis conveyed by deed to her son, James J. Davis, a tract of 143 acres of land, as stated in the habendum clause, “for a period of his natural life, and from and after his death to his issue, and should any of his children predecease him, the children of a predeceased child shall take together the share to which the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Antley v. AntleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Clark v. NevesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  3. Sherbert v. School Dist. 85, Spartanburg Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  4. Strother v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Breon v. Miller Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Purvis v. McElveenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  2. Woodle v. Hl Tilghman, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  3. Blume v. PearcySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. Johnson v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  5. Smith v. HannaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API