Legal Opinion

Adams v. Verner

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 10, 1915No. 9187PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Before Wilson, J., Walhalla, April, 1914. Action by Anna Catherine Adams and others against John D. Verner. From judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. The -facts are stated in the opinion. submit: The estate in Catherine H. Biemann, by the will of Catherine Biemann, if any, is a fee conditional: 98 S. C. 234; 56 S. C. 549; 71 S. C. 278; 1 Rich. Eq. 400; 1 Brev. 258; '3 Rich. Eq. 572; 65 S. C. 345; 1 Rich. Eq. 404; 2 Strob.

Read the full summary

Before Wilson, J., Walhalla, April, 1914. Action by Anna Catherine Adams and others against John D. Verner. From judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. The -facts are stated in the opinion. submit: The estate in Catherine H. Biemann, by the will of Catherine Biemann, if any, is a fee conditional: 98 S. C. 234; 56 S. C. 549; 71 S. C. 278; 1 Rich. Eq. 400; 1 Brev. 258; '3 Rich. Eq. 572; 65 S. C. 345; 1 Rich. Eq. 404; 2 Strob. Eq190; 48 S. C. 440; 52 S. C. 554; 47 S. C. 288; 76 S. C. 487; Leak on Property in Rands 135; 5 Rich. Eq. 441; Harp. 92; 67 S. C. 122; 90 S. C. 470; 82 S. E. 793; 20…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

Catherine Biemann devised the lands in dispute in these words: “To my beloved daughter-in-law, Catherine H. Biemann, wife of H. D. A. Biemann, to her and the heirs of her body, by the said H. D. A. Biemann, absolutely in fee simple forever.”

Plaintiffs are the children of Catherine H. by H. D. A. Biemann, who was the only child of testatrix. They claim, under the devise, as tenants in common with their mother. Two of them were born after the execution of the will, and one of these after the death of testatrix.

Catherine H. Biemann…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. NevesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Williams v. GauseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  3. Simms v. BuistSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  4. Reeves v. CookSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  5. Boykin v. AncrumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. BurnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  2. Strother v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. Cureton v. LittleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Burriss v. BurrissSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  5. Peecksen v. PeecksenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API