People v. Morgan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtComb, J.
Prom a judgment of guilty on four counts of issuing checks without sufficient funds, with intent to defraud, and one count of grand theft, defendant appeals. There are also appeals from orders denying (1) a motion for a new trial, and (2) a motion in arrest of judgment.
Defendant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment but claims that: (a) the court erred in denying his motion for a continuance, thus forcing *98him to trial without allowing him an opportunity to consult with his counsel and prepare a defense;1(b) The court had no jurisdiction to try defendant…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. NewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. DowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. Quiroz CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2020