People v. Newell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County and from orders denying a new trial and motion in arrest of judgment. George Samuels, Judge. Appeal from order denying motion in arrest of judgment dismissed. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
The district attorney of Alameda County filed an information against the defendant, Hugh H. Newell, charging him with a violation of section 476a of the Penal Code in making, drawing, uttering, and delivering a bank draft without funds or credit to meet it upon presentation. The draft is in words and figures as follows, to wit:
“San Francisco, Cal.
“Jan. 25 1919 19.....
“Wells Fargo Nevada National Bank
For Customers Use only
Pay to the Order of
Hal Warinack .......................$50.00
Fifty Dollars .......................Dollars
Value received and charge the same to account of
To Security Savings…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. McFarlaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- In Re Application of HarronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. CrosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.