Legal Opinion
Fischer v. Estate of Flax
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 2003No. 01-CV-184PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Appellants Benson J. Fischer, et al. sued Howard L. Flax, the law firm of Paley, Rothman, Goldstein, Rosenberg & Cooper (hereafter Paley Rothman), and Paley Rothman attorney Alan S. Mark for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, tortious interference, and other alleged misconduct arising from a financing transaction with a third party that did not materialize. The trial judge granted summary judgment to Paley Rothman and Mark. On the rescheduled trial date for Fischer’s claims against Flax, the judge denied Fischer’s renewed motion for a continuance and, when Fischer…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Ivan N. Schatz Joann B. Schatz v. Mark E. Rosenberg Mer Enterprises, Incorporated Stephen Jaeger Weinberg & GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Computer Sciences Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vanterpool v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
- Flax v. SchertlerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Jung v. JungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- New Economy Capital, LLC v. New Markets Capital GroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Oliver v. MustafaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.